COVID 19: Scientists remain divided on the origin of the virus

A recent research paper by British professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr Briger Sorensen says the novel coronavirus has no “incredible natural ancestor” and was created in a lab of scientists in China working on the ‘Gain of Function’ project in a Wuhan. lab, the Daily Mail reported on Sunday.

On May 26, American immunologist Dr Anthony Fauci said he did not believe the virus developed naturally. It was after a team of WHO scientists, who visited Wuhan to trace the origin of the virus that the possibility of the SARS- Cov 2 virus coming from a lab was unlikely. WHO Chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, posting the return of the WHO team said that the origin of the virus needs to be re-examined and thoroughly.

U.S. President Joe Biden on May 26 called on intelligence agencies to redouble efforts to investigate the origin of the COVID-19 virus.

Former Head Scientist of Epidemiology and Communicable Diseases of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Dr Raman R Gangakhedkar, on Sunday, told ANI that there was no evidence that the virus was a zoonotic infection or that it was artificially created. in a lab.

He added that we will have to wait for the evidence to draw any conclusions.

Like the research of British professor Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Sorenson, Chinese scientists took a natural “backbone” coronavirus found in Chinese cave bats and cut it into a new “spike”, making it a deadly coronavirus. Consistent with the research paper of Dalgleish and Sorenson, the ‘unique fingerprints’ of virus samples indicate that the virus may only be the result of manipulation in a laboratory.

Dr Gangakhedkar also said, that considering the scarcity of vaccines, it is ‘prudent’ to get those over the age of 45 to be vaccinated.

The research paper of Dalgleish and Sorenson says, that there is “intentional destruction, concealment or contamination of data” in Chinese labs and the scientists who tried to speak about it were silent.

“The implications of our historical reconstruction, we are now positive without reasonable doubt, of the deliberately manipulated chimeric virus SARS-CoV-2 that it is important to also consider what are the differences in the experiments. of ethically accepted Gain of Function, ”the research paper by reading the duo.

Dalgleish and Sorenson also alleged that Chinese scientists engineered the operation to make it the natural source of the virus.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *