Why Did the CDC Silently Abandon PCR Testing?


We have the details (most recent here and HERE) ang controversy surrounding COVID “casedemic” in America and the deceptive consequences of PCR testing and methods of its amplification in much detail over the past few months.

As a reminder, the “cycle thresholds” (Ct) are the level at which the most commonly used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test can detect a sample of COVID-19 virus. The higher the number of cycles, the lower the number of viral load in the sample; the smaller the cycle, the more virus in the original sample.

Many epidemiological experts argue that the cycle thresholds are one important measure by which patients, the public, and policy makers can be aware of judgments about how contagious and / or ill an individual who has a positive COVID-19 test. However, as JustTheNews reports, health departments across the country failed to collect that data.

Here are some news headlines from experts and scientific studies:

1. The experts compiled three datasets with officials from the states of Massachusetts, New York and Nevada concluding:“Up to 90% of people who test positive do not carry a virus.”

2. The Wadworth Center, a New York State laboratory, reviewed the results of the July tests at the request of the NYT: 794 positive tests with a Ct of 40: “With a Ct threshold of 35, estimated half in these PCR tests are no longer considered positive, ”According to the NYT. “And about 70% are no longer considered positive with a Ct of 30!”

3. There is a court of appeal in Portugal decided that the PCR process was not a reliable test for Sars-Cov-2, and therefore anyone the quarantine imposed in accordance with the results of the test is not against the law.

4. A new study from the American Society of Infectious Diseases, found to be in 25 breeding cycles, 70% of PCR tests that were “positive” were not “cases” because the virus could not be cultured, it was dead. And at 35: 97% of the positives were non -clinical.

5. PCR is not a test for disease, it is a test for a specific RNA pattern and this is the important pivot. If you crank it down to 25, 70% of positive outcomes are never “positive” in any clinical sense., since it won’t hurt you or anyone else

So, in summary, about our current “casedemic”, positive tests as they are now counted do not show a “case” of anything. They showed that viral RNA was found in a nose. It may be enough to make you sick, but according to the New York Times and their experts, it probably isn’t. And it’s certainly not enough to copy the virus to make anyone sick. But you’ll be sent home in ten days, even if you never sneeze. And this is the breathless number reported by the media… and used to intimidate mask mandates and lockdowns across the country…

on October we first revealed How PCR Tests have misled officials around the world into crazy reactions.

As in PJMedia’s Stacey Lennox wrote, the “casedemic” is the high number of cases we have seen nationwide due to an error in the PCR test. The number of times the sample is enlarged, also called the cycle threshold (Ct), is very high.

It identifies the people who there is no viral load that can make them sick or transmit the disease in other people positive for COVID-19.

the New York Times this error was reported on August 29 and stated that in the samples they tested from the three states where labs used a Ct of 37–40, up to 90% of the tests resulted in false positives. Experts in that article say a Ct of about 30 may be more appropriate for showing that a person can be contagious – those with a sense of contact tracking.

Just a few days ago, the CDC updated its guidelines to prevent testing for asymptomatic individuals. It is conceivable that the rationale for this is that some honest bureaucrats know that testing is not necessarily sensitive. He may have been humiliated.

This change was followed by an update in July that also restricted testing for recovered patients. The rationale for the update was that viral debris could be detected using PCR testing at 90 days after recovery. This is also true at some point in time when a person has an effective resistance response and never gets sick. There is already resistance from exposure to other coronaviruses good documentation. These are many of your “asymptomatic” cases.

However, due to political pressure and corporate media turmoil, the new testing instruction has been removed, and testing for asymptomatic individuals is also now recommended. Doctors did not receive Ct information from labs to make a diagnostic judgment. Neither the CDC nor the FDA has set guidelines for an accurate Ct to correctly diagnose an infectious disease.

As a result, our current “casedemic.” Positive tests as counted today do not show a “case” of anything. They showed that viral RNA was found in a nose. It’s enough to hurt you, but according to New York Times and their experts, perhaps not. And it’s certainly not enough to copy the virus to make anyone sick. But you’ll be sent home in ten days, even if you never sneeze. And this is the breathless number reported in the media.

A month later, Pascal Sacré, explained in detail how all current propaganda on the COVID-19 pandemic is based on an assumption that is considered obvious, true and beyond question. Positive RT-PCR test indicates COVID disease.

This assumption is misleading. Few people, including doctors, understand how a PCR test works.

The post Why Did the CDC Silently Abandon PCR Testing? appeared first in We have changed.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *