The senator asked the DOJ to investigate Fauci, the WSJ Editorial Board said the taxpayer should impose the Wuhan Virus Research Tax Fund.


Si Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) Sends a criminal referral to Dr. Anthony Fauci of the U.S. Department of Justice. Meanwhile, the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal called on Congress to investigate the National Institutes of Health’s funding of controversial research in Wuhan, China.

Defender experienced censorship on many social channels. Be sure to keep in touch with news that matters subscribe to our top news of the day. It’s free.

Following a threat he did last week, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) Sent an official criminal referral to Dr. Anthony Fauci of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Hill reports now

Paul asked Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate Fauci for allegedly lying to Congress when he said the National Institutes of Health (NIH) “has not and is not currently funding take-on-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. ”

Last week, Paul Fauci asked if he wanted to take the statement he made in Congress at a hearing on May 11. Paul said, “Dr. Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to Congress, would you like to retract your statement on May 11, in which you admitted that the NIH never funded the research to get a function and continue? “

Fauci replied he did not retract the statement and stated that he had never lied before Congress.

“You don’t know what you’re talking about, frankly, and I want to say that officially,” Fauci said. “You don’t know what you’re talking about. If anyone’s lying here, senator, it’s you.”

According to the Washington Examiner, in his letter, Paul told Garland that a 2017 research paper on experiments conducted at the Wuhan lab mentioned donation from the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) – where Fauci the director.

Paul said the paper discusses research that “where spike genes from two undiagnosed traits associated with SARS, Rs4231 and Rs7327, were combined in the genomic backbone of another coronavirus associated with SARS to create novel SARS -related viruses ”and that“ these experiments combined information from different SARS -related coronaviruses and combined it to create a novel, artificial infectious virus in human cells. “

The DOJ senator said contrary to Fauci’s argument, “this research, conducted by the Wuhan Institute of Virology and funded under the NIAID Award R01AI110964, fits the intended research that is profitable. ”

Garland can approve or ban the referral, only requesting an investigation.

The WSJ editorial board called for a Congressional investigation

The editorial board of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) on Sunday called on Congress to “thoroughly investigate the process that led to the approval of funding for WIV [Wuhan Institute of Virology] and possible research to be useful. ”

The board also said Congress should debate the limitations of this type of research in the U.S. and push for international standards.

The editors wrote:

“There is no need to expect the Chinese Communist Party to cooperate with a real one ask at the beginning of COVID-19. Even more disappointing is the lack of frankness from American scientists and officials whose conflicts of interest are further investigated. ”

The board has helped others in the past denounced a World Health Organization (WHO) report from earlier this year ending SARS Co-V2 is unlikely to leak from a lab. completion additional evidence appeared to contradict the WHO report, President Biden said in May ruling another investigation.

Last week, Biden administration officials were involved in the investigation SAYS They now believe the theory that the virus accidentally escaped from a lab in Wuhan is at least as credible as the possibility that it naturally grew in the wild.

The WSJ editors said the “U.S. knows something about the research the WIV is doing, because the American taxpayer dollar helped fund it.” They say the NIH provides almost $ 600,000 in WIV through a non -profit in many years of bat coronavirus studies.

They say Fauci’s claim that coronavirus research has not met with the federal government. meaning of the research that can be applied may be very real, but some scientists think that the definition of government is too limited and may allow de facto research to take on a function to bypass the protocols of safety

They cite Rutgers molecular biologist Richard Ebright who said the NIH -funded work “is – without a doubt – research -intensive.”

According to the WSJ, democrats and the majority the media avoid asking for more NIH -funded research investigation because Paul and the populist right did it.

“Such groupthink is what prevents lab-leak theories from being treated seriously for more than a year, ”the editors wrote. “Making the same mistake twice is not demanding.”





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *