Virologists Say Genetic “Fingerprints” Proof That SARS-CoV-2 is Man-Made


Two famous virologists claims to have found “unusual fingerprints” in SARS-CoV-2 samples that could only have emerged from laboratory manipulation, in accordance with an explosive 22-page paper obtained by Daily Mail.

British professor Angus Dalgleish – better known for making the world’s first ‘HIV vaccine’, and Norwegian virologist Dr. Birger Sørensen – head of the pharmaceutical company, Immunor, which has published 31 papers reviewed by the partner and holds several patents, wrote that while examining samples of the virus last year, the pair discovered “unique fingerprints” in the form of “six insertions” made by get-to-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

They also concluded that “SARS-Coronavirus-2 there is no “believable natural ancestry“and that “unreasonable suspicion” that the virus was produced by “laboratory manipulation.”

DailyMail.com exclusively acquired the 22-page paper scheduled to be published in the scientific journal Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery. In it, the researchers described their month -long ‘forensic analysis’ of experiments conducted at the Wuhan lab between 2002 and 2019.

A ‘GenBank’ table attached to the paper lists the different types of coronavirus, with dates collected and then submitted to the gen bank, showing a delay of several years for some.

Last year, Sørensen told the Norwegian broadcaster NRK that COVID-19 has properties ‘never seen in nature,’ and that the United States ’has been collaborating for many years on coronavirus research by studying China’s“ gain of function ”.

A diagram of the coronavirus shows six ‘fingerprints’ identified by the two scientists, in which they say the virus must have been produced in a lab.

The second diagram shows how a row of four amino acids found in the SARS-Cov-2 spike has a positive charge that attaches to human cells like a magnet, making the virus most contagious

The paper detailing their one-month “forensic analysis,” which looks at experiments conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology between 2002 and 2019, is scheduled to be published in the science journal Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery.

Further by Mail:

Digging journal archives and databases, Dalgleish and Sørensen met how Chinese scientists, some of whom have worked with American universities, are said to be developing tools to create the coronavirus.

Much of the work has centered on the controversial ‘Acquired Functionality‘research – temporarily banned by the United States under the Obama administration.

Gain of Function involves tweaking naturally occurring viruses to make them most contagious, so that human cells can be replicated in a lab, allowing for the potential impact of the virus on humans. to be learned and better understood.

Dalgleish and Sørensen claim that Scientists working on the Gain of Function projects took a natural ‘backbone’ of the coronavirus found in cave holes in China and inserted it into a new ‘spike’, making it lethal and more susceptible to SARS-Cov-2.

One indication of the alleged manipulation of the two men was given the cause was a row of four amino acids they found in the SARS-Cov-2 spike.

In an exclusive interview with DailyMail.com, Sørensen says that amino acids all have a positive charge, which is why the virus clings tightly to the free parts of human cells like a magnet, and is therefore more contagious..

But because, like magnets, positively charged amino acids repel each other, it is rare to find even three in a row of natural organisms, while four in a row are ‘more unlikely,’ said the scientist.

‘The laws of physics mean you don’t have four positively charged amino acids in a row. The only way you can get it is if you make it artificial, ‘ Dalgleish told DailyMail.com.

Their new paper states that these features of SARS-Cov-2 are ‘unique fingerprints’ that are ‘iused for purposeful maneuvering‘, and that ‘the probability that it is the result of a natural process is very small.’

A natural pandemic of the virus is expected to slowly change and became more contagious but less pathogenic which is what most would expect with the COVID-19 pandemic but not as occurring, ’the scientists wrote.

The implication of our historical reconstruction, we are now positive that without a doubt, the deliberately manipulated chimeric virus SARS-CoV-2 makes it necessary to also consider what differences in Gain of Function experiments are ethically acceptable..

The study concluded that ‘SARS-Coronavirus-2 has no credible natural ancestor’ and it is ‘unreasonable to doubt’ that the virus was produced through ‘laboratory manipulation’

When Sørensen and Dalgleish floated their findings last year, it is ‘debunked’ in thinnest logic – though Former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove pointed to the pair’s know-how as a “Significant” progress which may prove that the pandemic may have started with WIV.

Sørensen and Dalgleish not the first scientists to find out unusual shapes within COVID-19. In June, the Daily Telegraph reported having two unique features of COVID-19:

first, the virus further binds to HUMAN ACE2 enzymes than any other species, including bats.

second, SARS-CoV-2 has a “furin cleavage site” that is missing to close this relative of the bat-coronavirus, RaTG-13, making it even more contagious-a finding we reported in late February.

According to the Israeli geneticist, Dr. Ronen Semesh, the Furin site is the most unique find.

“I believe the most important issue regarding the differences between ALL coronavirus classes is the intrusion of a Furin protease cleavage site into the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2,” he said. “Such ingestion is rare in evolution, adding 4 amino acids alone in just 20 years is unlikely.. ”

“There are many reasons to believe that the COVID-19 that produces SARS-CoV-2 was made in a lab. Most likely through genetic engineering methods,” he said, adding “I believe this is the only way an intervention like the FURIN protease cleavage site can be identified directly in the right place and be effective.

Dr Semesh, who has a PhD in Genetics and Molecular Biology from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, and more than 21 years of experience in the field of drug discovery and development, said. it is even more “unlikely” that this penetration occurs in the exact area of ​​the cleavage site of the spike protein – which must occur in order for the virus to become more contagious. –Daily Telegraph

“What makes this even more questionable is the fact that this penetration not only took place in the right place and at the right time, but also made the cleavage site from a Serine protease cleavage site to a FURIN cleavage site,” it added. pa niya.

In January 2020, a group of Indian scientists wrote a now-revoked paper that the coronavirus can be genetically engineered to attach to parts of the HIV genome, which is written “This strange similarity to the novel penetration of the 2019- nCoV spike protein in HIV-1 gp120 and Gag is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature, ”Explains – it may not have happened naturally.

The following month, a team of researchers at Nankai University detected COVID-19 there is an ‘HIV -like mutation’ that allows it to easily enter the human body by binding to a receptor called ACE2 on a cell membrane.

Other highly infectious viruses, including HIV and Ebola, target an enzyme called furin, which works as a protein activator in the human body. Many proteins are inactive or dormant when they are produced and need to be “cut off” at specific points to activate their various activities.

To look at the genome sequence of the new coronavirus, Professor Ruan Jishou and his team at Nankai University in Tianjin found a section of mutated genes absent in Sars, but similar to those found in HIV and Ebola. –SCMP

According to a study by Nankai University, the furin binding method is “100 to 1,000 times more effective as SARS at infiltrating cells.

This protein predominates promcuous protein, it is found in many human tissues and cell types and is involved in many OTHER types of virus activation and infection mechanisms (it is linked to the mechanisms of HIV, Herpes, Ebola and Dengue viruses), ” as Dr. Semesh. “If I tried to engineer a virus filter that had a much higher affinity and could infect humans, I would do that.: I will add a Furin Cleavage site directly to the original less effective and much more specific area of ​​cell cleavage. ”

Meanwhile, Flinders University Professor Nikolai Petrovsky found last year “a strange coincidence or a sign of human intervention” in the interior of COVID-19 speaking of Telegraph that COVID-19 is “Beautifully adapted to people.”

“We never know where this virus came from – that’s the truth. The two possibilities are that it was a chance to transmit a virus… the other possibility that it was an accidental release of the virus from a laboratory, ”he said, adding that“ One of the possibilities is that a host animal was infected with both coronavirus at the same time and COVID-19. The same process can occur with the petri-dish. ”

“In other words COVID-19 could have been made from the regeneration event of a host animal or it could have occurred in a cell culture experiment. I’m definitely in favor of a scientific investigation. Its only purpose would have been to get to the bottom of how it ended with the disease and how we could avoid a future pandemic. “

remember – the reporting of anyone this past year being punished for expelling social media, demons, and popular articles from publishers suggesting the points discussed by the CCP.

Published from ZeroHedge.com with permission



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *