Reporter Who Breaks Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Story and Receives “Significant” Death Threats Found Dead


The body of a reporter in Birmingham, Alabama who broke the story about the controversial 2016 tarmac meeting in Phoenix between former President Bill Clinton and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch was found Saturday morning as an ‘obvious suicide, ‘agreed to AL.com.

45 -year -old Christopher Sign – a news anchor at ABC 33/40 in Birmingham, was discovered around 8 a.m. by Hoover police and fire personnel, according to the report.

“Our deep sympathies are shared by Christopher’s loving family and close friends. We have lost a respected co-worker whose unsustainable sign will serve forever as a sign of the integrity, honesty and integrity of the journalist. We can only hope that his legacy will continue. May his memory be for blessing, ”he said ABC 33/40 Vice President and General Manager Eric Land of a statement.

The tarmac bombshell, which gives the appearance that Bill Clinton privately pleaded guilty to his wife’s email case after the FBI launched James Comey’s new investigation, is believed to have contributed to Hillary Clinton’s disappearance in 2016.

Meanwhile, first, complained last year of receiving ‘meaningful’ death threats, having his credit cards hacked, and making code-words available to his children.

Sign, an Emmy-winning reporter, made nation headlines at a June 27, 2016 tarmac meeting at Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport amid an FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of an unauthorized server. The meeting between Clinton and Lynch took place days before Comey announced that the bureau would not push charges against Hillary – after the agency changes the language describing Clinton’s behavior from “gross negligence” to “excessive caution.”

“Gross negligence” is a legal term in the art of criminal law that often accompanies loss. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, gross negligence A severe level of neglect taken as careless preaching, “Ug”Apparently without concern for a legal duty, safety of others, or their rights. “Excessive negligence,” on the other hand, is not a legal term in art.

In addition to the “gross negligence”-> “especially careless” editing (done by embarrassed FBI agent Peter Strzok), the FBI removed a compelling reason for raising Clinton’s actions were basically “gross negligence” – that is, “In classified material on Clinton’s server. In the original draft, the “too much material” material “supports a reason that participants neglected their information management.”

Also taken from Comey’s statement are all references to the Intelligence Community’s involvement in the investigation of Clinton’s private email server, as well. Changing the language to reduce the likelihood that Clinton’s server was hacked by hostile actors, changing their language from “reasonable possibility” to “possible”- change that removes yet another rationale for the phrase “Gross negligence.” To put it in perspective, “reasonable probability” means that the probability of a hack due to Clinton’s negligence is more than 50 percent, while hacking that is “possible” alone is any probability that above zero.

In short, Bill Clinton’s tarmac meeting see which really had the effect of investigating his wife, despite the fact that he was still defeated. And now the man who broke the story is dead.

Published from ZeroHedge.com with permission





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *