America’s leading virologist, Anthony Fauci, argued in 2012 that the risks of a lab accident triggering a pandemic are further underscored by the potential benefits of manipulating viruses through research to get a function, consistent with a previously faceless statement reported by Sharri Markson by The Australian.
“In an impossible but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist was infected with the virus, which would lead to an outbreak and eventually trigger a pandemic?“Fauci wrote to the American Society for Microbiology in 2012, adding“ Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – even remotely – should initial experiments be conducted and / or published first, and what are the processes involved in this judgment? “
“Scientists working in this field can say – as I have already said the benefits of such experiments and the known outcome outweigh the risks, ”Fauci continued. “It is very likely that a pandemia will occur in nature, and the need to keep ahead of such a threat is a major reason for conducting an experiment that could be seen as dangerous.”
In the paper, Dr Fauci also writes: “Within the research community, many have expressed concern that significant research progress may be halted. just for fear that someone, anywhere, might try to copy such experiments. This is a valid concern. ”
Dr Fauci led the U.S. response to the outbreak but now faces serious questions about his role in funding the radical experiments conducted within the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Dr Fauci on May 11 would reverse his position if Covid-19 leaked from WIV, and said he is now “not convinced” that the virus developed naturally and the authorities need to know “what exactly happened”.
Experiments that have gained use – often with coronavirus -derived batons – have focused on manipulating, splicing and reassembling viruses that can turn into highly contagious and less understandable pathogens. sick. -Astralia
This and more on Fauci from my book “What Really Happened in Wuhan”… you can pre-order it on Amazon https://t.co/od8I1zLUSh
– Sharri Markson (@SharriMarkson) May 28, 2021
And what it is
It is very hard to find.
Here is the whole hearing and Fauci is found dead on the rights. https://t.co/J6WECrHL28
– SCUBA MIKE? (@ scuba2024) May 28, 2021
Earlier this month, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) will go to town when Dr. Anthony Fauci on Tuesday during a hearing before the committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. Paul alleged that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) used a middle man to funnel the Wuhan Institute of Virology through the EcoHealth Alliance-which works with the lab on bat coronavirus projects.
Paul specifically mentions research as “get-into-the-action” which in this case focuses on how to make animal viruses more susceptible to humans – especially a coronavirus.
“Government scientists like yourself have favored taking up operational analysis,” Paul started…
… Just to have Fauci say “I don’t want to get an analysis of China’s functioning,” adding “You’re saying things that aren’t right.”
Paul returns – continued:
“[Those who favor gain of function] say that COVID-19 mutations are unintentional and not human-designed. ”
“I have no account of what the Chinese can do,” Fauci returned, adding that he was in favor of further investigation, but the NIH had nothing to do with the origin of COVID-19.
“We are not funded to obtain functional research on this virus at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” he added.
“No matter how you say it, it doesn’t happen.”
As we are noticed in March, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) – led by Fauci, “Funded numerous projects involving WIV scientists, including much of the work in the Wuhan lab with coronavirus bats.”
Zhengli Shi was sent to the Wuhan lab after his paper (2015) on the inclusion of a coding sequence for a spike protein binding to human ACE2 receptors.
That’s what operational research got, illegal in the USA in 2014.
They were funded by Fauci and Peter Daszak of Wuhan. Link
– Noelle Smith (@ 425Noelle) May 28, 2021
In 2017, Fauci’s agency continued to fund a controversial grant without the approval of a government governing body, according to Daily Calling. For context, in 2014, the Obama administration temporarily suspended federal funding for take-at-function research on bat coronavirus. Four months before that ruling, the NIH effectively transferred this research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) through a present of the nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance, led by Peter Daszak.
The NIH’s first $ 666,442 The $ 3.7 million installment provided by EcoHealth was paid in June 2014, with the same annual payment until May 2019 under “Understand the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Outbreak”Project.
Labi na, the WIV “to openly engage in research to gain skills in collaboration with U.S. universities and institutions” in the years of the leadership of Dr. Shi ‘Batwoman’ Zhengli, agreed with Washington Postthe Josh Rogin.
Meanwhile, Fauci ‘hit by’ research obtained at the function in December of 2017 without permission.
Via The Australian:
Several Trump administration officials told The Weekend Australian DFauci did not raise the issue of also starting to fund research on older White House figures.
“It’s kind of just passing through, ”According to an official.
“I think there’s truth to the narrative that the staff (National Security Council), the president, the chief-of-staff of the White House, those people are in the dark that he’s going back to the research.”
This was also confirmed by Weekend Australian Neither Mike Pompeo, the former director of the Central Intelligence Agency, nor National Security Council member Matthew Pottinger, was appointed.
The experiments were also opposed by prominent scientists, including the Cambridge Working Group of 200 researchers who issued a public warning in 2014.
“The accident risks of newly created“ potential parasitic pathogens ”raise new concerns,” the group’s letter read. “Making the laboratory more portable, novel types of risky viruses, especially but not limited to the flu, presents many risks.
“An accidental infection in such a condition can cause outbreaks that are difficult or impossible to control. Historically, new strains of influenza, once the human population shift is established, have affected un-quarter or more of the world’s population within two years. ”
And Steven Salzberg, of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, said in 2015 the research benefits obtained are “fewer than most” and they can be “much more safely obtained through other research methods”.
“I am very concerned that the ongoing research into influenza viruses, and even more so now of other viruses, poses an even more serious public health risk,” he wrote.
Is the risk worth it, according to Fauci?
Published from ZeroHedge.com with permission