‘They Censor Not Viewing Ineaching and That Is Wrong’ • Protecting Children’s Health


Defender experienced censorship on many social channels. Be sure to keep in touch with news that matters subscribe to our top news of the day. It’s free.

Alex Berenson thinks social media companies have moved away from censoring opposing views.

In a conversation with The Protector, Berenson shared how he was banned from Twitter for 12 hours because he linked to an article with data that challenged the mainstream narrative that COVID vaccines effective.

The former New York Times reporter and writer of 12 novels and two non -fiction books – and now author of the publication Substack “No Report Facts”- said Twitter which suddenly flagged several posts about COVID.

Berenson said:

“My post says something really weird is happening –– vaccines are failing, and it is. I’m dealing with a long line of data showing that taking the vaccine is almost in contrast to a number of infections –– the countries with the most catches are now in the middle of the third wave. I just pointed this person out and I linked it. “

Berenson reported that Twitter tagged his post for his mistake and misleading, disabled his account for 12 hours and banned people from commenting on his tweet.

“I think I will be fired if I do not stop – which I would not do, ”Berenson said.

When asked about the increasing censorship of social media platforms, Berenson explained:

“Grabe. I don’t censor and RFK Jr. not censored and Naomi Wolf doesn’t have to be censored… It’s a free country and Twitter is an effective universal platform. I understand that this is a private company, but it is an important resource for distributing news and they have a responsibility to allow free speech.

Berenson said if social media companies want to protest what’s wrong, then they might lose accountability protection. He points to what the Biden administration is all about pushing companies on social media to make it difficult for people like him to get their message out.

On July 15, White House Press Secretary Jenn Psaki spoke while a press briefing the Biden administration, through senior staff members and the COVID-19 team, is actively working with social media companies to censor specific views deemed “misinformation.”

Psaki said:

“In terms of the actions… we have taken – or we are working to say – from the federal government: We have increased disinformation research and tracking within the Surgeon General’s office. We have flagged those with problems as post for Facebook widespread disinformation. We work with doctors and medical professionals… who are renowned to their audiences for having accurate information and maximizing reliability. “

Berenson said this in response to Psaki’s comments:

“They censored dissenting views and that’s wrong. For example the next administration, instead of stopping The New York Times from selling the papers, told Exxon not to sell any diesel to The Times so they can’t print it and deliver it. ‘We’re not censoring. We’re just asking a private company to act against other private companies.’ That’s why they’re doing it. “

Berenson held that Psaki was guilty of spread of misinformation in his statement to the White House Press on July 16 when he said COVID vaccines have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and have gone through the gold standard of the FDA approval process. However, he was not censored.

Here is what Psaki had to say:

“The risk and impact there is that this different information increases… the risk of potential side effects associated with western vaccines. This is what… some of the misinformation it does – and misleads the public by falsely alleging that mRNA vaccine not tested and, thus risky, even if many of them are approved and have passed the gold standard in the FDA approval process.

“But, frankly, pushing the information out there is that these tested, approved vaccines are ineffective and not helpful-a lot of people on these platforms, they don’t choose, as you all know, among source of information. And that can be detrimental as well. ”

Twitter should not choose politics. It should have nothing to do with politics, Berenson explained.

As he:

“If the vaccines are almost 100% effective, people will line up for them on the streets. They won’t have a problem convincing 30 to 40% of the country to get the vaccine. The reason they have a problem is because effects true and many people have them after the shooting, COVID is not dangerous and there are questions about their effectiveness.

“It’s not because of me. I am a person with a Twitter account. We are opposed to an entire construction here. If the message is more sincere and what they actually say, there is no problem getting people vaccinated. ”

Berenson, whose children received their childhood vaccines, supports the issue of vaccination because of COVID and believes the solution to the speech issue is more language.

“Obviously there are people saying horrible things on Twitter and everywhere,” Berenson said. “But outside of the constitutionally recognized hate speech, it doesn’t have to be suppressed.”

Berenson said it annoyed him that his former colleagues at The Times didn’t seem to feel it loud – that it was okay to insult people.

“They make living writing stories that people don’t want and one day they want to have them. [cared about this issue], ”Berenson said.

When it comes to media reporting, Berenson said he works for The Times, reporting should be purposeful and fair. Now, “the media is more willing to attack,” he said.

Berenson added:

“There’s a new aggressive movement with opinionated news stories, and what’s the danger that places like The Times still believe and show themselves neutral if they don’t. Social companies media and Wikipedia supposedly have neutral information checkers, and that’s not true.

“Whenever a checker says something is partly true or partly wrong, they say an opinion. What happened is Facebook says ‘our checkers say X or Y’ and it’s true that what they’re doing is using the screen’s indiscriminate fact -checking to remove information they don’t want. ”

Berenson explains:

“If I say VAERS [the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System] showed that 5,000 died after getting the vaccine, that’s true. You could say that it doesn’t prove that people died after getting the vaccine, and that’s also true, but my statement that 5,000 people died is still true.

“To say I lied or RFK Jr. nagsayup. To say that we are not allowed to express our opinion is twice wrong. ”

Berenson said he did not know if reporters intentionally engaged in reporting unfairly or inaccurately.

“It’s hard to get other people’s heads and it’s hard to know how smart they are and if they understand the data and how much people repeat it with each other,” he said.

Berenson wrote for The Times from 1999 to 2010. For the past 18 months he has regularly posted on Substack about COVID.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *