Federal Lawsuit Seeks Quick Halt on COVID Vaccines, Citing Whistleblower’s Testimony Claiming CDC Did Not Count Vaccine Deaths • Protecting Children’s Health

Defender experienced censorship on many social channels. Be sure to keep in touch with news that matters subscribe to our top news of the day. It’s free.

Doctors in French America (AFLDS) submitted a motion July 19, seeking immediate assistance from Alabama Federal District Court to stop the use of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) vaccines COVID – Pfizer / BioNTech, Modern and Johnson and Johnson (J&J) – for three groups of Americans.

Agreed to a press release, AFLDS requests that the management of experiment COVID vaccines for anyone 18 and older, all cured from COVID and obtained natural resistance, and every other American who did not receive knows permission as defined by federal law.

the 67-page action asks the judge to issue a preliminary order in accordance with § 360bbb – 3 (b) (1) (C) for the following reasons:

  • There is no emergency, where there is a requirement to issue a change in EUA and EUA for COVID vaccines.
  • There is no “illness or condition that is serious or life -threatening.”
  • Vaccines do not diagnose, treat or prevent SARS-CoV-2 or COVID.
  • They are aware of the potential risks of the vaccine beyond their knowledge and potential benefits.
  • There are adequate, approved and available options for vaccines.
  • Health care professionals and vaccination candidates are not well known.

The authors of the motion are attached a declaration of a whistleblower who recently blamed deaths that occurred within 72 hours of receiving a COVID vaccine without being reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Bad Vacation Vaccine Reporting System (VAERS) maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

As of July 9, reported dead of VAERS total of 10,991. Of those, 4,593 occurred within the 72-hour vaccination period.

Whistleblower – a computer programmer who has created more than 100 different healthcare fraud algorithms, and has expertise in healthcare data analytics that allows him to access Medicare and Medicaid data obtained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Systems (CMS) – submitted us aka oath under the penalty of perjury alleging the actual number of deaths related to the COVID vaccine was nearly 45,000.

The whistleblower said VAERS, while more profitable, has not reported a conservative cause of at least five.

In his statement, he said:

“On July 9, 2021, there were 9,048 deaths reported by VAERS. I verified these numbers by collecting all the data from VAERS myself, not trusting a third party to report it. Simultaneously of this, I questioned data from CMS medical claims regarding vaccines and patient mortality, and observed that deaths occurring within 3 days of vaccination were higher than those reported by VAERS in a factor of at least 5. This will show that the number of vaccine-related deaths is true at least 45,000. In hindsight, the swine flu vaccine was taken out of the market resulting in only 53 deaths. ”

AFLDS says the findings are shocking, and informed consent is impossible if the safety data is inaccurate.

In a press release, AFLDS said:

“It is unlawful and unconstitutional to conduct experimental agents on individuals who are unable to make an informed decision about the true benefits and risks of the vaccine on an independent basis. They must be of age or age. capacity to make informed judgments and is provided with all the risk / benefit information necessary to make an informed decision. ”

One of the named plaintiffs, Deborah Sobczak, the mother of a 15- and 17-year-old, said in the statement:

“My son is not the subject of an experiment. What different monsters do we allow ourselves to control? Perfectly healthy children develop heart inflammation, brain hemorrhage and even die! I have enough. I did not sacrifice my son in such a way a strengthening companies can experiment with him. This madness must stop. “

There is no emergency EUA guarantees COVID vaccines, complainants say

Agreed to COMPLAINT, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary, named as one of the defendants in the lawsuit, was declared on Feb. 4, 2020, agreed to § 360bbb – 3 (b) (1) (C), that SARS-CoV-2 creates a “public health emergency.”

The initial declaration of emergency that it was updated regularly and remains in force today – a necessary legal requirement for the release of the EUA vaccine, the complaint said. The EUA authorized the majority use of vaccines in the American public prior to the completion of the standard regimen of clinical trials and FDA approval.

Plaintiffs allege the declaration of emergency and many of its revisions are illegal because there is no cause of emergency. Using HHS COVID mortality data, SARS CoV-2 has an overall survival rate of 99.8% worldwide, rising to 99.97% for people under the age of 70. This is consistent with seasonal flu, the complaint said.

Plaintiffs argue that HHS deliberately exaggerated the data in the COVID case.

Plaintiffs allege that HHS data was intentionally exaggerated. On March 24, 2020, HHS amended the rules that apply to coroners and others responsible for issuing death certificates and making “cause of death” judgments exclusively for COVID.

The rule change states: “COVID-19 must be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease is or is believed to be the cause or cause of death.”

Agreed to COMPLAINT, HHS statistics show 95% of deaths are associated with “COVID-19 deaths” involving an average of four additional comorbidities. The plaintiffs claimed that the CDC was aware of the rules for coding and selecting the underlying cause of death that would result in COVID being the underlying cause more than not.

The plaintiffs alleged that the actual number of COVID cases was also much shorter than the reported number due to the emergency use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, used as a diagnostic tool for COVID. PCR tests are self-experimental products, approved by the FDA under separate EUAs. The package includes state PCR tests that do not need to be used to detect COVID.

The complaint alleges the manner in which PCR tests were administered was known to guarantee an unacceptably high number of false positive results.

COVID vaccine endangered undisclosed and unreported, lawsuit says

AFLDS medico-legal researchers analyzed the accumulated COVID vaccine risk data and found migration to the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the body. Although vaccines are allowed without study showing where the spike proteins travel in the body after vaccination, how long they remain active and what effect they have, the complaint said.

end examined by the researchers VAERS and was discovered to be at greater risk of dying from the COVID vaccine. The database shows vaccine mortality in the first quarter of 2021 representing a 12,000% to 25,000% increase in vaccine mortality, annually.

From 2009 to 2019, there were 1529 reported deaths along with all vaccines reported by VAERS, the motion agreed. In the first quarter of 2021, there were more than 4,000 reported deaths with 99% of all reported vaccine deaths in 2021 attributed to the COVID vaccine. Only 1% is dedicated to other systemic vaccines.

Plaintiffs also cited evidence of reproductive damage, vascular disease, autoimmune disease, neurological damage and they showed an increase. risk of injury for children with the COVID vaccine to support their position.

Why the secret around V-Safe data?

the COMPLAINT called the CDC’s attention to concealment V-Safe system – a similar system used to track reported adverse events through a smartphone app exclusively controlled by the CDC.

Plainters increased anxiety that V-Safe information will exceed that of VAERS. They say VAERS is accurate because it is likely to include less than 1% of all vaccine adverse events, and the federal government does not provide data from other monitoring sources such as V- Safe, CMS and military.

Plaintiffs stated that with informed consent it was impossible not to understand the risks. They say they can’t help but wonder why HHS fails to publicly disclose to the public critical risk -related information from these reporting systems, ”especially given the fact that they have the time and resources to study. and awaiting approvals for vaccines, creating a large vaccine marketing machine and running vaccine clinics across the country. “

The lawsuit was filed by several law firms, including RENZ Act. Reading the complaint and whistleblower can be read HERE.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *