The recent conviction of wrongdoing and an eight-month prison sentence on Jan. 6 protesting Paul Hodgkins is a violation of any idea of justice. It is a political indictment and a political judgment in a political court. Every American regardless of political persuasion should fear a court system to see politics instead of justice.
We’ve seen this movie before and it doesn’t end well.
Worse than this lack of justice is the prosecutor’s contemptible attempt to mark Hodgkins – who has no criminal record and is accused of no violent crime – a “terrorist.”
As journalist Michael Tracey writes, U.S. Special Assistant Mona Sedky declared Hodgkins a “terrorist” in court proceedings not for committing any terrorist action, not for any acts of violence, not even for imagining an act of terrorism.
Sedky wrote in his sentencing memo, “The Government… acknowledged that Hodgkins did not personally participate in or support violence or property damage.” He added, “we agree that Mr. Hodgkins is not under the legal definition of a domestic terrorist.”
However Hodgkins should be considered a terrorist because the actions he took – entering the Senate to take pictures of himself – occurred in an incident in which the court “framed… in the context of terrorism.”
That crossed a slippery slope. He is not a terrorist because he has committed a terrorist act, but because somehow the “context” of his actions is, in his words, “continuing democracy.”
That is, Hodgkins deserves more punishment because he committed a presumed crime. The judge in the case, Randolph D. Moss, also admitted. In bringing a Trump flag to the Senate, he said Hodgkins, “declared his loyalty to an individual in the country.”
As Tracey points out, while eight months in prison is a ridiculously long sentence for standing on the floor of the “People’s House” and taking pictures, it is also a ridiculously short sentence for a terrorist. . If Hodgkins is a terrorist, shouldn’t he be sent for at least eight months?
The purpose of showing the Soviet trials was to create an enemy that could collectively engage the public in hatred and blame for all the failures of the system. Its purpose is to make one part of the population against another part of the population and demand that they be “canceled.” And it worked very well… for a while.
In a recent article, libertarian author Jim Bovard quotes from Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago about how average people demand “justice” for the state’s designated “political” enemies. : “There were universal meetings and demonstrations (including school children). It was the newspaper march of millions, and the noise rose outside the court windows: ‘Death! Death! Death!’ ”
While we’re not there, we’re moving in that direction. Americans are sent to prison not for what they did, but for what they believed? Is that the kind of America we really want to live in?
While many Biden supporters are happy to see the hammer fall on pro-Trump, non-violent protesters, they need to remember: the kind of totalitarian “justice” system they applaud will soon come for them. . It always is.
Published from RonPaulInstitute.org with permission